Document Vault for Compliance Teams

Per-attachment access control, encryption at rest, and access audit logs - the controls SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and FedRAMP auditors want to see on regulated documents in Jira.

Product: Document Vault Audience: Compliance Teams
Get Document Vault on the Marketplace ↗

Why this matters for compliance teams

Compliance programs work by generating evidence on a schedule and producing it on demand. The hard part is the data-collection side: most evidence is reconstructed at audit time from sources that weren’t designed to produce it. That reconstruction is slow, error-prone, and expensive in both calendar time and audit costs.

Document Vault changes the model from reconstruction to attestation. The access controls run continuously in production. The audit log is generated continuously, as a side effect of normal operation. When the auditor asks for evidence, the data is already there in the format they want.

For most compliance programs, this is the difference between three months of audit prep and three days. For organizations going through SOC 2 Type II for the first time, the time savings often pay for the app several times over in the first audit cycle.

How it slots into existing GRC tooling

Compliance teams using Vanta, Drata, Tugboat Logic, OneTrust, or similar GRC platforms can ingest Document Vault’s access log directly via CSV export or webhook. The events appear alongside the GRC tool’s other evidence (system logs, MFA enforcement, employee training) without parallel data collection. The audit becomes a single export rather than a multi-source reconstruction.

For organizations without a GRC tool, Document Vault’s own audit report is auditor-ready: a CSV of access events plus a summary of vault policies, signed with a timestamp. Many smaller compliance teams use this as the primary evidence artifact for the access-control families.

What compliance teams are dealing with today

  • SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA auditors ask for evidence of access control on regulated data in Jira; native Jira can't produce per-attachment access logs.
  • Sensitive documents (customer data, financial records, regulated artifacts) attached to Jira tickets inherit the issue's permissions - too broad for compliance use.
  • Encryption at rest is required by most frameworks for sensitive data; Jira Data Center stores attachments unencrypted on disk by default.
  • Auditor wants a list of every user who's downloaded a specific document in the past year. Native Jira doesn't capture this.
  • Sensitive documents migrate out of Jira (to shared drives, to Confluence with restricted permissions) to avoid the exposure, fragmenting the compliance record.

How Document Vault helps compliance teams

Per-attachment ACL

Restrict individual attachments to specific users, roles, or groups - independent of the issue. The compliance team can lock regulated documents while the rest of the ticket stays operationally visible.

Encryption at rest

Vaulted attachments are encrypted on disk (Data Center) or end-to-end before storage (Cloud). Server admins and storage operators cannot read the content. Keys can be held in an HSM.

Per-access audit log

Every download of a vaulted attachment generates a structured audit event with user, timestamp, IP, and content identifier. The log is the evidence auditors want.

Retention policies

Apply retention windows to vaulted attachments independently of Jira's native retention. Common pattern: 7-year retention for financial documents, 6-year for healthcare records, indefinite for litigation hold.

Bulk classification

Apply a vault policy across an entire project, issue type, or JQL set. The compliance team can mark all customer-data attachments as Restricted in a single configuration step rather than per-file.

Use cases

  1. SOC 2 Type II evidence pack. Auditor requests evidence of access controls on regulated artifacts. Export the vault policy report + the access audit log for the audit window in a single bundle - the standard SOC 2 CC6 evidence.
  2. HIPAA-bound projects. Projects handling PHI default all attachments to the HIPAA-clearance group, encrypted at rest, with full download logging. The technical safeguards required by the Security Rule are configuration, not custom code.
  3. PCI DSS scope reduction. Vaulted attachments don't appear in unauthorized users' issue views, supporting PCI's principle of restricting cardholder data access to the smallest possible group. Reduces in-scope user count for PCI audits.
  4. GDPR data-subject access requests. When a data subject requests their data, the compliance team can search vaulted attachments by classification and produce only the in-scope documents. Audit log proves the request was handled.

Common questions from compliance teams

Which compliance frameworks does Document Vault address?

Any framework that requires demonstrable access control, encryption at rest, or per-access audit logs on regulated documents. The common ones: SOC 2 (CC6 logical access), ISO 27001 (A.9 access control), HIPAA Security Rule (164.312 technical safeguards), PCI DSS (Requirement 7 access control + Requirement 10 logging), GDPR (Article 32 security of processing), FedRAMP (AC-3 access enforcement, AC-2 account management).

Can Document Vault generate audit reports auditors recognize?

Yes. The access log exports as CSV/JSON with the fields auditors check: user, timestamp, document classification, action (download, view, delete), source IP. The format is intended to plug into existing GRC tools (Vanta, Drata, Tugboat, OneTrust) rather than to be a parallel evidence system.

Does encryption at rest also cover backups?

Yes - the encryption happens at the storage layer, so backups capture encrypted ciphertext. Restoring a backup requires the same key material as live access, so backup access control inherits the same protections.

How does Document Vault interact with right-to-delete requests?

Vaulted attachments can be deleted on demand, and the deletion event itself is logged. Many compliance teams configure a 'pending review' state where deletion requests are recorded and reviewed before execution - useful for jurisdictions that require deletion within a window but also require a hold check.

Is Document Vault appropriate for FedRAMP-bound workloads?

Document Vault's encryption and access-control architecture is consistent with FedRAMP technical control requirements (AC-3, AC-6, AU-2, SC-13). Whether a specific deployment is FedRAMP-authorizable depends on the broader Jira deployment's authorization boundary - talk to your FedRAMP advisor before relying on Document Vault inside a controlled boundary.

Try Document Vault for your team

Document Vault works for compliance teams on Jira Cloud and Data Center. Install from the Atlassian Marketplace, or read the main Document Vault page for the full feature list.

Try Document Vault on the Atlassian Marketplace ↗   See the full Document Vault overview →

Also built for

Document Vault solves a different problem for each team: